Dating for poor people
While 46 percent of college-educated Americans know someone who met a long-term partner or spouse online, only 18 percent of those with high school degrees can say the same.
Moreover, a full 58 percent of college graduates know someone who has dated online, versus just 25 percent of high school graduates. One intuitive theory is that low-income people simply cannot foot the bill for all of the coffees and cocktails often associated with dates.
(Notably, Tinder did not always feature the second set of details, unlike its competitors.
It introduced this section in November to allow users to make more “informed decisions.”) In the absence of any meaningful information about a potential partner, users have a tendency to substitute employment and education—both signifiers of social status—for, say, mutual interests and compatibility.
On most of these apps, users swipe through a series of profiles that often consist of no more than a few photos and, importantly, a workplace and alma mater.The result is that people couple up along socioeconomic lines.Case in point: of the three people I met up with from Tinder, each was white and had the social and economic capital to build enviable resumes and graduate from some of the most elite institutions in the country. Over the past fifty years, the likelihood that two people with a college diploma will marry each other has risen markedly.Employer hostility coupled with changes in labor law have hacked away at union strongholds.Blue-collar jobs, which once paid wages that allowed a single breadwinner to support a family, have been replaced by low-wage work in the service sector.