Interracial dating according to the bible devon soltendieck dating
Darwinian evolution was (and still is) inherently a racist philosophy, teaching that different groups or “races” of people evolved at different times and rates, so some groups are more like their ape-like ancestors than others.
The Australian Aborigines, for instance, were considered the missing links between the ape-like ancestor and the rest of mankind.1 This resulted in terrible prejudices and injustices towards the Australian Aborigines.2 The leading evolutionary spokesperson, Stephen Jay Gould, stated that “Biological arguments for racism may have been common before 1859, but they increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory.”3 Racist attitudes fueled by evolutionary thinking were largely responsible for an African pygmy being displayed, along with an orangutan, in a cage in the Bronx zoo.4 As a result of Darwinian evolution, many people started thinking in terms of the different people groups around the world representing different “races,” but within the context of evolutionary philosophy.
But does the Word of God really condemn such mixes as those above?
Is there ultimately any such thing as “inter-racial marriage”?
If a white person is looking for a tissue match for an organ transplant, for instance, the best match may come from a black person, and vice versa.
The ABC news science page stated, “What the facts show is that there are differences among us, but they stem from culture, not race.”14 The only reason many people think these differences are major is because they’ve been brought up in a culture that has taught them to see the differences this way.
The truth though is that these so-called “racial characteristics” are only minor variations among people groups.
If one were to take any two people anywhere in the world, scientists have found that the basic genetic differences between these two people would typically be around 0.2 percent—even if they came from the same people group.12 But, these so-called “racial” characteristics that people think are major differences (skin colour, eye shape, etc.) “account for only 0.012 percent of human biological variation.”13 In other words, the so-called “racial” differences are absolutely trivial—overall, there is more variation one group and another.
However, there is no such indication in this passage that what is called “inter-racial marriage” is condemned.
Scientists today admit that, biologically, there really is only one race of humans.
For instance, a scientist at the Advancement of Science Convention in Atlanta stated, “Race is a social construct derived mainly from perceptions conditioned by events of recorded history, and it has no basic biological reality.”5 This person went on to say that “Curiously enough, the idea comes very close to being of American manufacture.”6 Reporting on research conducted on the concept of race, the American ABC News science page stated, “More and more scientists find that the differences that set us apart are cultural, not racial.
In , we read of the rebellion at the tower of Babel which resulted in people being scattered over the earth.
Because of this dispersion, and the resulting splitting of the gene pool, different cultures formed, with certain features becoming predominant within each group.